Is our compression due to a BC current or neutrinos?

Dedicated to our late Forum member Grey Area, a place for discussing science and technology based subjects.

Is our compression due to a BC current or neutrinos?

Postby katesisco » Aug 10th, '12, 21:17

The electric universe--W Thornhill-- and Miles Mathis both see our energy as renewable and connected via an even larger circuit. Could there be a unit that like our human cell is designed to admit and expell on a reciprocal basis? Looking at how the protein chain works --think bucket brigade-- it takes 7 turns of the protein pump to create a molecule of ATP. It is not easy to understand; so difficult that it was not depicted until 1971.
Lewis Thomas of Lives of a Cell (nobelist) actually wrote comparing the solar system to a human cell. As such, the workings would be much more complex than a filament of current able to enter at will, or be so easily renewed. Say photons are recycled and maintain their integrity. And that anti photons are stilled by bumping into a slew of matter photons. And once stilled, can regain spin by collisions that turn them matter-wise. What then was the initial event that brought about the matter/anti-matter imbalance?

If we are under going heliospheric compression that is creating core heating, and there is a release of energy that follows, is there as a Russian scientist suggests, energy outside our heliosphere that impacts it? Does the BC current enfold the heliosphere and its charge compresses? Is there an interchange via capacitor receptivity connected to the galactic core that enables our system to receive charge cum matter?

If our system has in the relatively recent past accepted galactic charge as mass, then wouldn't it follow that this is not unusual? Kepler finds mostly twin sun systems with one or two planets. The implication is not that our multi-planet system is rare, or that we are, but that we and our systems complexity is ephemeral.
katesisco
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Jan 27th, '11, 20:36

Re: Is our compression due to a BC current or neutrinos?

Postby Shadowwolf » Aug 11th, '12, 00:10

katesisco wrote:As such, the workings would be much more complex than a filament of current able to enter at will, or be so easily renewed. Say photons are recycled and maintain their integrity. And that anti photons are stilled by bumping into a slew of matter photons. And once stilled, can regain spin by collisions that turn them matter-wise. What then was the initial event that brought about the matter/anti-matter imbalance?

If we are under going heliospheric compression that is creating core heating, and there is a release of energy that follows, is there as a Russian scientist suggests, energy outside our heliosphere that impacts it? Does the BC current enfold the heliosphere and its charge compresses? Is there an interchange via capacitor receptivity connected to the galactic core that enables our system to receive charge cum matter?

If our system has in the relatively recent past accepted galactic charge as mass, then wouldn't it follow that this is not unusual? Kepler finds mostly twin sun systems with one or two planets. The implication is not that our multi-planet system is rare, or that we are, but that we and our systems complexity is ephemeral.


I'm sorry but all this honestly does not make any sense at all, recycled photons, once stilled regain spin, heliospheric compression creating core heating, all looks pretty much like technobabble strung together. Perhaps if you put it in a more basic, condensed way I might see what you're getting at. ;)
Hope is but the first step upon the road to disappointment.
User avatar
Shadowwolf
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4128
Joined: Jul 28th, '09, 17:25
Location: Where I mean to be.


Return to General Discussion, the Grey Area


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest