by The Beige Avenger » Feb 10th, '10, 14:56
There's no fight here although it is a little frustrating when it seems that there is deliberate belligerence and obstinateness to simplifications conveying a general point.
Change matters not if there is not something it changes relative to, in this case, relative to itself at an earlier point in time. Change can be relative to any common factor for the system... it need not be time, it could be distance, or whatever.
For instance, plot a graph, the data is nice and the straight line trend intersects all points. If we take the rate of change of the quantity on the y-axis (y2-y1) and divide it by the rate of change for the corresponding values (x2-x1) on the x-axis (dy/dx) we get the slope of the graph i.e. the gradient. Similarly if we take the equation of the line (y=mx+c) and differentiate it we get dy/dx = m.
If the order is reversed and you performed y1-y2/x1-x2 you get the same result.
Caveats apply as it is entirely possible that the information contained in the above post is either an attempt at a wind-up, an attempt at a joke or just plain wrong.