MikeG wrote:On the other hand, wasn't it Elon Musk of SpaceX fame who stated a similar time frame for Mars settlement as these guys? Maybe there's an agreement we arent aware of.
I think so, their site makes frequent mention of SpaceX's Falcon rocket and the in development heavy lift variant as the surface to orbit workhorse and launch system. Of course SpaceX probably expects to be paid for the service and is not in it for the endeavour alone.
M Paul Lloyd wrote:After all pioneers have generally been the poor and disenfranchised of society who seek a better life.
True, many have had a very compelling reason to influence their departure though that may be offset by the lure of virgin territory that not only is nothing like anywhere else on Terra, but is an entirely new world. However, other pioneer / colonist efforts involved groups far larger than four with more supplies and more space in an at least habitable place and still many failed.
MikeG wrote:SW, you sure know how to rain on a parade.
Well every silver lining has a cloud, I just point it out
Incidentally here's another, the transit ship doesn't exist even as a design plan yet, it's merely a series of 'expects' and 'can be built by', thus not even a build cost can be hazarded and this thing is supposed to be built in orbit and launched in ten years? They don't even have the orbital construction facility never mind the ship itself. Even the supply and hab landers don't actually exist even though they are expected to be larger versions of the current Dragon capsule, and these are timetabled to be getting sent to Mars in about four years. So, even if we accept the premise of their mission as reasonable the timetable is wildly and unrealistically short, especially as they don't even have the money to fund the project to get it running.
The more I look at it the more incredibly naive it looks I'm sorry to say.
Hope is but the first step upon the road to disappointment.