by MikeG » Jan 11th, '12, 06:56
Their methods seem a bit lax. They make assumptions a bit too quickly for instance, they used some type of genetic manipulation, obviously designed for something else to remove thecentrosome, meaning they hadn't examined the worm closely. Then they assume that the absence of a centrosomes in flatworm means it plays no role in cell division in other organisms as well? Maybe the flatworm has solved this problem independently, in a different manner, which is what allows it to be cut up and regrow. They should look for another species with a centrosome, and remove that to study the effects, before extrapolating their findings to include all organisms. Exceptions to the rule exist everywhere. Maybe this is one.
"Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts." (Sign hanging in Einstein's office at Princeton)