Prof Brian Ratcliffe, spokesman for the Nutrition Society, said dehydration was usually caused by a clinical condition and that one could remain adequately hydrated without drinking water.
Professor of what? This works if you are a gerbil, obtaining all the water you need from metabolising your food, but a human needs fluid intake to survive. Whether it is tea, milk, fruit juice, whatever; the vital component is WATER.
If you have gastro-enteritis or dysentery, then no source of plain water will hydrate you, because it will go straight through. That is why, without medical support, dysentery particularly is a killer. So a sweeping satement on the hydrating properties of water is technically incorrect...but seriously.
The issue is really about claims suggesting a particular brand does it better, which is arrant nonsense, but is it worth the substantial cost that this exercise has raised? The eurocrats involved, under previously existing consumer law, had merely to turn to the producers and ask them to prove their claim. "No? Then take it off the bottle."
What next? "Warning, this packet of peanuts, may contain nuts"? Instructions on a pack of toothpicks?
Douglas Adams was not a comedy writer, he was a prophet!

Knowledge comes, but wisdom lingers.