Primary links
Have you travelled through a rainbow and seen the other side? One reader wrote to our expert Robert Matthews about a childhood experience that had always puzzled him. If you've had a similar experience, leave comments below (register to have a name to make comments) or on our Facebook page.


Robert Steel emails: "Robert Matthews’s answer about rainbows in the February issue’s Q&A has prompted me to ask if science can now explain a phenomenon my teachers could not.
When I was about 10, my father took me to a park, and I spotted the end of a rainbow. It was coming down from the sky and landing in a field about 300 yards (275m) away. Being curious, I went up to it. As I approached, it seemed to move away and get fainter, but I was gaining.
Eventually, I passed though what appeared to be the end of the rainbow. I turned around, and there was the rainbow. I was looking at the other side.
It was some years later that I read in my school physics textbook how rainbows occur. This seemed to imply that what I had seen was impossible. My headmaster suggested I write to someone, but did not say who, so I did not write. Until now.
Can you explain how this occurred?"
Robert Matthews writes in response: "Over the years I’ve received numerous reports of people who say they have either walked or driven through the end of a rainbow.
The most perplexing thing is that they also mention being able to see the rainbow on both sides. This is impossible to explain if – as is usually assumed – there is only one source of light entering the water droplets responsible, namely the Sun. But if by some fluke another bright source, say, a reflection of the Sun, was also present, it’s possible that a ‘reverse rainbow’ could be created.
Certainly I’m not about to dismiss such reports as ‘obviously’ mistaken. Perhaps other readers have similar reports, or theories of their own?"
As I understand it, rainbows are formed by the refraction of light passing through individual raindrops, and then reflecting off the back of those raindrops towards the viewer. Rarely the light can reflect twice inside the raindrop and cause a 'double rainbow' to be viewable, or even bounce around again and cause a triple rainbow. Could light reflect off the back of the raindrop and then again off the inside of the front of the raindrop to cause a rainbow to be viewable from 'the other side'?
Also, just to be ultra-pedantic, is it true to say that you can't walk 'through' a rainbow because each rainbow is specific to the point of observation? The person standing next to you also sees a rainbow, but it's created by slightly different raindrops and slightly different angles. If you take a step towards the rainbow, you lose the rainbow you were originally seeing, and instead see a new one. So although you could see a rainbow from the 'other side', it's a different rainbow and not the back of the same rainbow?
Since a rainbow is not a physical object it cannot be approached therefore it would be impossible to simply walk past and view from the other side. For an observer it often appears that a second person may be standing at the exact spot at the end of a rainbow but the fact is that the second person can observe the rainbow by looking us at the same angle as the first observer. A simple experiment to disprove the theory of reversed rainbows is to have a person hold a water hoze with a spray nozzle up towards the light on a sunny day until they can see a mini-rainbow appear through the droplets of water. Then have another person stand beyond the spray (looking back towards the first person) and ask if they can see the mini rainbow.